What We Do

When most people pray, the first thing most say is --I need or Please help; BUT the most important thing is forgotten. Praise Him first then pray for His guidance, for He already knows our needs.

Merry Christmas

Happy Chanukah

As The Debates Continue, The Questions Are More Direct. Here Is The Video Of The Debate Incase You Missed It

.
This is the forum for a Presidential Debate ?

Are these questions right for the People in making the decision for the Highest Office ?

Are the answers by these hopeful seekers of the Highest Office respecting the People ?

Watch the body language as each candidate tells the People, what it means to them !
.
   
.
Read more...World Net Daily

What If They Cry Wolf?

..............................................................................................................
What do you know, the Ugly Heads of One World Governance rears it's Ugly Heads!

..............................................................................................................
 Responsibility to Protect, or Responsibility to Act, as cited by President Obama, is a set of principles, now backed by the United Nations, based on the idea that sovereignty is not a privilege but a responsibility that can be revoked if a country is accused of "war crimes," "genocide," "crimes against humanity" or "ethnic cleansing."

  The Global Center for Responsibility to Protect is the world's leading champion of the military doctrine.
 Billionaire activist George Soros is a primary funder and key proponent of the Global Center for Responsibility to Protect. Several of the doctrine's main founders also sit on boards with Soros.

~Soros himself outlined the fundamentals of Responsibility to Protect in a 2004 Foreign Policy magazine article titled "The People's Sovereignty: How a New Twist on an Old Idea Can Protect the World's Most Vulnerable Populations."

In the article Soros said, "True sovereignty belongs to the people, who in turn delegate it to their governments." 
 "In particular," he continued, "the principle of the people's sovereignty can help solve two modern challenges: the obstacles to delivering aid effectively to sovereign states, and the obstacles to global collective action dealing with states experiencing internal conflict."

 Read more:  World Net Daily

 But first, things have to be put in place.
  Eric Holder delivered his remarks as prepared at the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing about Fast and Furious. That means he not only called for tighter gun control regulations — he also accused the House of Representatives of keeping law enforcement in the dark “when individuals purchase multiple semi-automatic rifles and shotguns in Southwest border gun shops.”
 In his testimony, Holder also advocates for new gun-control laws that he says would have halted, or at least prevented, Operation Fast and Furious. Holder echoes California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s comments from last week, when she argued that stricter gun laws would have stopped law enforcement agents from facilitating the sale of guns to Mexican drug cartels.

Let's see, if the People are disarmed, the US Government will be less likely to go astray;

according to the words of US Attorney General Eric Holder and California Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein.

 If not, then the New World Governance Military, will come a Rushin to our aid? 

 Hat Tip: The Conservative Lady And Hot Air

Was He Talking About The One? Were These People Ahead Of Their Time? Did They Look Back Far Enough In History - They Saw Today?

"The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation on the ruins of public liberty.
It serves always to distract the public councils and feeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which find a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions.
It is important, likewise, that the habits of thinking in a free country should inspire caution in those entrusted with its administration to confine themselves with in their respective constitutional spheres, avoiding in the exercise of the powers of one department to encroach upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all departments in one and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a real despotism.
If in the opinion of the people the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed."

…George Washington’s Farewell Address…

Do Not Read This If You Want To Sleep At Night.

14th Amendment
Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any Office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Insurrection: a rising against established authority; rebellion; revolt.

.

A rising against civil and or political authority.

WND Founder, Joseph Farah , At Odds With Esquire Magazine

Corsi's high-flying book challenging Barack Obama's eligibility for office

The founder and chief executive officer of WND has decided to pursue an aggressive legal challenge of what he calls Esquire's "libelous smear" in which the magazine's executive editor published a completely fictional article claiming Jerome Corsi's best-selling book – "Where's the Birth Certificate?" – was being pulled from the shelves and destroyed and that book purchasers were being offered refunds.

Read more: Farah vows to sue Esquire, 'take ownership' http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=300761#ixzz1NKxv996X

You Need Me. Pelosi Told Boehner

Pelosi is wrangling for a seat at the table for the budget  cuts-Aka: Debt Ceiling ascendency.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/55074.html#ixzz1NEnLyOSi

Insurance Companies Brokers And Agents Political Donations At A glance

Name	Amount Received
Sen. Lisa Murkowski [R, AK]	$71,600
Sen. David Vitter [R, LA]	$58,950
Sen. Robert Portman [R, OH]	$33,300
Sen. Charles Grassley [R, IA]	$31,500
Sen. Roy Blunt [R, MO]	$30,900
Sen. Richard Burr [R, NC]	$27,500
Sen. Jim DeMint [R, SC]	$24,500
Sen. John Thune [R, SD]	$23,800
Sen. John Isakson [R, GA]	$22,000
Sen. Michael Crapo [R, ID]	$20,500
Rep. Eric Cantor [R, VA-7]	$23,500
Rep. Dan Boren [D, OK-2]	$21,250
Rep. Joe Barton [R, TX-6]	$20,500
Rep. John Boehner [R, OH-8]	$20,250
Rep. Cynthia Lummis [R, WY-0]	$20,000
Rep. Doc Hastings [R, WA-4]	$19,650
Rep. Al Green [D, TX-9]	$16,400
Rep. Michael McCaul [R, TX-10]	$15,500
Rep. Jim Matheson [D, UT-2]	$15,500
Rep. Kevin McCarthy [R, CA-22]	$15,500

Major (Mulitinational) Oil And Gas Producers Political Donations At A Glance

Name	Amount Received
Sen. Lisa Murkowski [R, AK]	$71,600
Sen. David Vitter [R, LA]	$58,950
Sen. Robert Portman [R, OH]	$33,300
Sen. Charles Grassley [R, IA]	$31,500
Sen. Roy Blunt [R, MO]	$30,900
Sen. Richard Burr [R, NC]	$27,500
Sen. Jim DeMint [R, SC]	$24,500
Sen. John Thune [R, SD]	$23,800
Sen. John Isakson [R, GA]	$22,000
Sen. Michael Crapo [R, ID]	$20,500
Rep. Eric Cantor [R, VA-7]	$23,500
Rep. Dan Boren [D, OK-2]	$21,250
Rep. Joe Barton [R, TX-6]	$20,500
Rep. John Boehner [R, OH-8]	$20,250
Rep. Cynthia Lummis [R, WY-0]	$20,000
Rep. Doc Hastings [R, WA-4]	$19,650
Rep. Al Green [D, TX-9]	$16,400
Rep. Michael McCaul [R, TX-10]	$15,500
Rep. Jim Matheson [D, UT-2]	$15,500
Rep. Kevin McCarthy [R, CA-22]	$15,500

Teacher Unions Political Donations At A Glance

Name	Amount Received
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand [D, NY]	$20,000
Sen. Barbara Boxer [D, CA]	$19,832
Sen. Michael Bennet [D, CO]	$12,000
Sen. Harry Reid [D, NV]	$12,000
Sen. Charles Schumer [D, NY]	$12,000
Sen. Barbara Mikulski [D, MD]	$12,000
Sen. Patty Murray [D, WA]	$7,500
Sen. Al Franken [D, MN]	$5,750
Sen. Mark Kirk [R, IL]	$2,500
Sen. Patrick Leahy [D, VT]	$2,500
Rep. Michael Capuano [D, MA-8]	$119,302
Rep. Mark Critz [D, PA-12]	$34,860
Rep. Judy Chu [D, CA-32]	$27,500
Rep. John Garamendi [D, CA-10]	$22,500
Rep. Ted Deutch [D, FL-19]	$20,000
Rep. William Owens [D, NY-23]	$17,500
Rep. Nancy Pelosi [D, CA-8]	$15,000
Rep. Colleen Hanabusa [D, HI-1]	$15,000
Rep. Joe Courtney [D, CT-2]	$15,000
Rep. Steny Hoyer [D, MD-5]	$13,500

Labor Unions Political Donations At A Glance

Name Sen. Harry Reid [D, NV]	Amount Received $8,000
Sen. Robert Menéndez [D, NJ]	$7,500
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand [D, NY]	$6,000
Sen. Al Franken [D, MN]	$5,000
Sen. Charles Schumer [D, NY]	$5,000
Sen. Patty Murray [D, WA]	$3,750
Sen. Robert Casey [D, PA]	$1,000
Sen. Barbara Boxer [D, CA]	$1,000
Sen. Barbara Mikulski [D, MD]	$1,000
Sen. Carl Levin [D, MI]	$0
Rep. Steny Hoyer [D, MD-5]	$16,000
Rep. Gerald Connolly [D, VA-11]	$12,250
Rep. Nancy Pelosi [D, CA-8]	$10,000
Rep. Donna Edwards [D, MD-4]	$6,000
Rep. Larry Kissell [D, NC-8]	$5,000
Rep. Mark Critz [D, PA-12]	$5,000
Rep. Shelley Capito [R, WV-2]	$5,000
Rep. James Clyburn [D, SC-6]	$5,000
Rep. Nick Rahall [D, WV-3]	$5,000
Rep. Melvin Watt [D, NC-12]	$5,000

Trial Lawyers and Law Firms Political Donations At A Glance

Name	Amount Received
Sen. Harry Reid [D, NV]	$458,739
Sen. Charles Schumer [D, NY]	$141,462
Sen. Barbara Boxer [D, CA]	$92,660
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand [D, NY]	$46,608
Sen. Patrick Leahy [D, VT]	$39,731
Sen. Patty Murray [D, WA]	$33,300
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse [D, RI]	$27,500
Sen. Mark Begich [D, AK]	$26,000
Sen. Ron Wyden [D, OR]	$24,950
Sen. Richard Durbin [D, IL]	$24,250
Rep. Mike Quigley [D, IL-5]	$61,900
Rep. Bruce Braley [D, IA-1]	$46,771
Rep. Lloyd Doggett [D, TX-25]	$41,000
Rep. William Owens [D, NY-23]	$24,600
Rep. Patrick Meehan [R, PA-7]	$23,200
Rep. Barbara Lee [D, CA-9]	$21,750
Rep. Janice Schakowsky [D, IL-9]	$20,350
Rep. Charles Rangel [D, NY-15]	$19,600
Rep. Corrine Brown [D, FL-3]	$19,400
Rep. John Barrow [D, GA-12]	$17,800

Bills Heating Up

S.679 - Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011

A bill to reduce the number of executive positions subject to Senate confirmation.

Stories Written:

CREATING AMERICA'S FIRST DICTATOR THROUGH SENATE LEGISLATION S.679

Obama and Senate Rewriting Article II

S.350 - Environmental Crimes Enforcement Act of 2011 

Stories Written:

Making Lawyers Wealthy enough to Keep the Democrat Party Political Campaign Coffers Full

Meredith Attwell Baker Is The Lastest Thorn In The New York Times Calling For Expanding The Lobbying Disclosure Act Definitions

Lisa Rosenberg  > Sunlight Foundation
In the most recent, and possibly most repugnant, turn of the revolving door, FCC commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker will join Comcast just months after approving the Comcast/NBC Universal merger. The move spurred the New York Times to call for expanding the definition of lobbying. We agree. While Baker’s hiring may be a done deal, the lobby laws need to be changed so that we know who she is lobbying, about what, and when.
The current laws do next to nothing to inform the public about the ways Baker will wield her power on Capitol Hill. Sunlight is calling for changes in the current Lobbying Disclosure Act that would require her and others like her to report the names of the offices she lobbies—whether in person, on the phone, in writing or email—and link the names with the specific issues on which she sought government action. We would require that reporting to happen in real time and online.
We may not be able to close the revolving door, but we can find out what happens whenever people pass through it.
Rules put in place by the Obama administration mean that Baker will not be allowed to lobby anyone at the FCC for two years. That’s a sliver of an exclusion that leaves her plenty of opportunities to spread the Comcast/NBC message inside the beltway. The day after she starts, this well-connected, high-ranking administration official can start lobbying Congress on any issue, including the Comcast/NBC merger.


Will this ever find it's way to the Halls of Congress?